About polymaths
Sources.
Everything we say about polymaths should be checkable. Here is where it comes from.
Listing a source does not mean its author is connected to or endorses Polymath Alliance.
The research behind it.
Polymathy is not just an old idea. Researchers are studying it now. Here is what one major recent study found, in plain language.
The study
Polymathy as a way of engaging with knowledge.
In 2025, Michael Araki completed a PhD dissertation at the University of Louisville on polymathy and its link to creativity and innovation. He argues that polymathy is not a label for a few geniuses. It is a way of engaging with knowledge that many people have, and it can be measured.
He defines it as three things working together:
- Breadth: how widely you go.
- Depth: how deeply you go.
- Integration: how you connect what you know.
All three are needed. A high score on one does not make up for a low score on another.
What he found
Linked to creativity and innovation.
Araki built a 33-item questionnaire to measure what he calls polymathic orientation, and tested it with people in several countries. In his samples, people who scored higher also tended to report:
- more innovative behavior at work,
- more creativity,
- expertise in more fields,
- and more self-directed careers.
These links held up beyond what general openness to experience explains.
The limits
What it does not show.
- The strongest links are between answers in the same survey. Where the outcome was measured achievement or a creativity task, the links were much smaller or absent.
- It does not prove that polymaths are more creative. It shows the two go together in these samples.
- Most participants came from online panels in English-speaking countries, and the scale has not been tested across cultures.
Why it matters to us
The basis for our three pillars.
Our three pillars, Learn many things, Connect the dots and Build what's next, are plain-language names for breadth, integration and depth. Build what's next adds one thing of our own: making something real. Araki ends by saying organizations were not built for people like this, and that we need places where they can thrive. That is what Polymath Alliance hopes to become.
The Polymath Test is our own work, in development, and separate from Araki's questionnaire. He has not reviewed or endorsed it.
Source: Araki, M. (2025). Polymathy: The foundational source of creativity and innovation. PhD dissertation, University of Louisville. All sources are on the Sources page.
Thank you, Michael Araki.
Much of what we understand about polymathy rests on Michael Araki's work. His 2025 dissertation at the University of Louisville brought decades of writing on the subject together, built a clear model of breadth, depth and integration, and created a way to measure it. Our three pillars are plain-language names for his three parts: Learn many things (breadth), Connect the dots (integration), Build what's next (depth). If you want to go deeper, start with his work.
The research.
- Araki, M. 2025. Polymathy: The foundational source of creativity and innovation. PhD dissertation, University of Louisville. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/4642
- Araki, M. 2020. "Scientific polymathy: The end of a two-cultures era." The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32564-4
- Araki, M., and Cotellessa. 2020. "Creative polymathy and the COVID-19 crisis." Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601508/full
- Trofimova, I., and Araki, M. 2026. "Beyond grades: Temperament and interests, but not school grades, highlight distinct polymathic learning abilities." Journal of Intelligence 14(2):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14020026
- Root-Bernstein, R., et al. 2008. "Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members." Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology 1(2):51–63. https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/energy/2008-rootbernstein.pdf
- Root-Bernstein, R., and Root-Bernstein, M. 2020. "A statistical study of intra-domain and trans-domain polymathy among Nobel laureates." Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1751545
- Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., and Ivcevic, Z. 2010. "Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener." Learning and Individual Differences 20(4):380–387. DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.001.
- Alabbasi, Runco and Ayoub. 2024. "Creative activity and accomplishment as indicators of polymathy among gifted and nongifted students." Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255508/full
- Carson, Peterson and Higgins. 2005. Creative Achievement Questionnaire. https://www.gwern.net/doc/psychology/2005-carson.pdf
Books.
- Burke, P. 2020. The Polymath: A Cultural History from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300260465/the-polymath/
- Ahmed, W. 2018. The Polymath: Unlocking the Power of Human Versatility. Wiley. https://wiley-vch.de/en/areas-interest/finance-economics-law/the-polymath-978-1-119-50848-9
- Epstein, D. 2019. Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World. Riverhead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range:_Why_Generalists_Triumph_in_a_Specialized_World
- Root-Bernstein, R., and Root-Bernstein, M. 1999. Sparks of Genius. Houghton Mifflin.
- Wapnick, E. 2017. How to Be Everything. HarperOne. ISBN 978-0062566652.
- Wapnick, E. 2015. "Why some of us don't have one true calling." TEDxBend talk. https://www.ted.com/talks/emilie_wapnick_why_some_of_us_don_t_have_one_true_calling
The history of the word and the idea.
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "Heraclitus." https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heraclitus/
- Sententiae Antiquae. 2017. "Learning, Knowing, Doing Much: Greek Fragments on Polymathy." https://sententiaeantiquae.com/2017/06/20/learning-knowing-doing-much-greek-fragments-on-polymathy/
- Wikipedia. "Johann von Wowern." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_von_Wowern
- Lynge & Son. Rare-book listing: Wower, De Polymathia Tractatio, Editio Nova, Leipzig 1665. https://lynge.com/product/40124
- Wikipedia. "Polymath" (Montagu 1621, Burton 1624, Wowern 1603, polyhistor; cites the OED). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath
- Wikipedia. "Polyhistor." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyhistor
- Wikipedia. "Daniel Georg Morhof." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Georg_Morhof
- Burckhardt, J. 1860. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, Part Two, "Personality" (Middlemore translation). https://www.ellopos.net/politics/renaissance/2-individual.asp?pg=7 and https://www.ellopos.net/politics/renaissance/2-individual.asp?pg=8
- Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Renaissance man." https://www.britannica.com/topic/Renaissance-man
- Wikipedia. "Leon Battista Alberti." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Battista_Alberti
- Wikipedia. "Scientist" (Whewell, 1833 and 1834). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientist
- Wikipedia. "Thomas Young (scientist)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Young_(scientist)
- Wikipedia. "The Last Man Who Knew Everything." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Man_Who_Knew_Everything
- Berlin, I. 1953. The Hedgehog and the Fox. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hedgehog_and_the_Fox
- Wikipedia. "The Two Cultures." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two_Cultures
- Merriam-Webster. "polymath" (first known use 1624). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polymath
- Merriam-Webster. "polymathy." https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polymathy
- Merriam-Webster. "Renaissance man" (first known use 1906). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Renaissance%20man
- Online Etymology Dictionary. "polymath." https://www.etymonline.com/word/polymath
- Online Etymology Dictionary. "Renaissance." https://www.etymonline.com/word/Renaissance
People.
- Wikipedia. "Benjamin Franklin." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
- Wikipedia. "First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Draft_of_a_Report_on_the_EDVAC
- Wikipedia. "Demis Hassabis." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demis_Hassabis
- Wikipedia. "Stephen Wolfram." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Wolfram
- Wikipedia. "Neri Oxman." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neri_Oxman
- Wikipedia. "Brian May." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_May
- Wikipedia. "Mae Jemison." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mae_Jemison
- Wikipedia. "Questlove." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questlove
- Wikipedia. "Mayim Bialik." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayim_Bialik
- Wikipedia. "Ken Jeong." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Jeong
- Wikipedia. "Brian Cox (physicist)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Cox_(physicist)
- Wikipedia. "Jaron Lanier." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaron_Lanier
- Wikipedia. "Kevin Kelly (editor)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Kelly_(editor)
- Society for Science. Blog post on Ed Thorp (STS 2026 conversation). https://www.societyforscience.org/blog/ed-thorp-sts-2026-conversation/
Polymatheia.
- Plutarch. Quaestiones Convivales (Table Talk) 9.14. Goodwin's English translation, public domain. https://cts.perseids.org/read/greekLit/tlg0007/tlg112/perseus-eng2/9.14.1-9.14.7